Â
Following his widely-reported comments in a recent press conference, Mark Allen gave On Q Promotions Janie Watkins a frank and exclusive interview where he got to tell more of his side of the story. (Interview Source)
Â
Courtesy - On Q Promotions
Â
First of all Mark, youâre facing a possible disciplinary hearing with the WPBSA for swearing.
âYes, that was totally wrong and Iâd like to apologise. We are professional sportsmen and role models for young people and I was out of order to swear.â
Â
Youâve stated that you were one of the players who didnât vote for Barry Hearn to take over the sport. Can you explain your thinking behind that decision last year?
âI didnât really think that one single person should have total control of such a big business.
âThe players now have no say in what goes on. All 100 players on tour could vote a certain way on a matter but Barry could decide to go another way.
âI donât think thatâs good for any business. But the players who voted for Barry knew what they were getting into.
âThere was another plan that was just maybe a few extra major ranking events. I thought that would be more beneficial to the players than maybe bringing in the PTCs.â
Â
Barry Hearn has described himself as a benevolent despot, would you agree with his own assessment?
âYes I suppose thatâs what he is. I think in the long term he will do well for the sport but in the short term I think heâll ruffle a lot of feathers. It will make a lot of players unhappy.
âIâm not the first player whoâs spoken out and I wonât be the last. It does seem that when I say something itâs blown out of all proportion.â
Barry has said recently that heâs running the sport and has a 5 year business plan and this is only year 1. Heâs asking for players to have a bit of patience and stick with him.
âI hope heâs right. If itâs a 5 year plan then so be it. But weâre into the 2nd year. I think a lot of the changes heâs made, heâs put a lot of the players off.
âThe only upside of what heâs done is that the players are playing a lot of snooker and we cried out for more snooker and Barryâs saying Iâve given them more snooker, what more do they want?
âBut itâs not just about giving more snooker, any Tom, Dick or Harry can come in and give people more snooker. Itâs about giving them quality snooker I think.â
Â
Â
One of the headaches that Barry has is creating a circuit that works for everyone. Recently players have spoken out about the calendar, about the PTCs, where theyâre played and the prize funds. What are your views on the PTCs and how they could work better?
âI understand why theyâve been brought in. Itâs giving the players more snooker. It gives the amateurs a chance to compete against the professionals, if they win now and again, which is good.
âIt affects people in different ways. Obviously Iâm affected because of the distances I have to travel, a lot more than many players. Of course thereâs also players worse off than me, like the players from China and other countries.
âThen there are the players lower down the tour. If they donât do too well in the PTCs, take players like Joe Meara, heâs going to have to stop playing after Christmas because itâs too expensive. Financially itâs just not feasible for those lads to travel and play in these events if theyâre not going to get the money back.â
Â
On that basis do you think that when a player qualifies for their pro ticket, they should be on some sort of guaranteed money?
âYes pretty much. If youâre in any job, then youâre in a job that gets you money over a year. Any person in a job gets a wage over a year.
âWhether thatâs in Tesco or as a lawyer or whatever and they know how to plan and how to budget.
âFor a professional snooker player, particularly at the bottom end of the tour, thereâs no guarantees. If they play every tournament and if they donât do particularly well theyâre probably going to spend ÂŁ20,000 in a year.
âMaybe that should be thought about a little more. It is affecting a lot of people coming into the game and people coming onto the tour.
âThey have to dedicate themselves to the sport and take time away from work and their family and theyâre not getting any rewards for it, in my opinion.â
Â
Is it comparable to golf? Players get their tour ticket but if they donât make the cut then they wonât earn prize money?
âI understand that, you have to make the cut, or win matches to get money.
âBut I think comparing it to golf is a little naive. Considering the money involved in golf. I think the person who lost their card on the US Tour last year still won something like $600,000.
â In the golf the cut off point is the top 125 stay on tour. Put that in comparison. Thatâs a great wage for someone who hasnât done that well.
âIn comparison to snooker youâll get someone who hasnât even made ÂŁ10,000.â
Â
Regarding the PTCs, several players have spoken out saying that the events at the EIS in Sheffield should be scrapped, and maybe just go to Europe to promote the sport and raise the prize funds.
âI understand where the players are coming from on that.
âWhen you go to Sheffield youâre playing in front of the other player and the referee. Iâm not too bad with that, you have to get on with things.
âBut some players, take Ronnie for instance. You can picture Ronnie playing in Sheffield and just playing in front of the referee and his opponent. You canât think of anything thatâs motivating Ronnie to win that match.
âAt the end of the day you work hard, all the top 16 players worked hard to get there and they want and expect to play in arenas and live on television and the Sheffield events donât do that.
âThe European events arenât too bad. You go to Germany or Poland, itâs always good atmosphere and theyâre very well run events.
âMaybe itâs more of the European events are what snooker needs instead of Sheffield and maybe putting the money into the European ones.
âIt would be more beneficial to have 6 European events instead of 12 overall and double the prize money.â
Â
Courtesy - On Q Promotions
Â
Players have recently said they know itâs their job but itâs hard to get âupâ for a PTC.
âI spoke to Terry about this. I just canât motivated for them. To play in front of nobody for very few ranking points and very little money.
âThe money isnât the be all and end all, donât get me wrong. I want to play snooker for tournament titles.
âI hope to look back on my career when Iâve finished and say Iâve won this and Iâve that. Itâs not all about money. But at the end of the day you have to live and you need money and the PTCs just donât do that.â
Â
Do you think that for the higher ranked players the âentertainerâ factor comes in. That while youâre there to win a match thereâs a bit of the showman that they want to perform in front of an audience?
âI think so, yes. Some players just go out to win and donât care about putting on a show, but top players do perform and they try to entertain.
âAfter all people pay good money to come and watch us play. I think thatâs only right that we put on a show.
âItâs like any other sport. Youâd be very disappointed if you went to a football match and the players just stood there for 90 minutes. You wouldnât be too happy would you!
âYou have to appreciate that the fans are taking time out of work and spending their money, especially in the current climate with the recession. I think the players do have a job to do to go out there and entertain.â
Â
Courtesy - On Q Promotions
Â
Players have also criticised the congestion on the calendar and the amount of travel and time away from family . Fans have responded saying that they have to go to work 9-5 and leave their families. Do you have any thoughts on that?
"Of course I have my own problems as people know. My daughter Lauren lives away in England so I donât get to see her as much as Iâd like.
âBut itâs become even harder now with so many events. Reanne has her own snooker to play on the ladies tour and itâs hard for me to get the chance to get across to see Lauren as much as Iâd like.
âI can completely understand what anyone with a family is saying. It is hard but for the people working 9-5 jobs, they still go home to their family at the end of every day.
âWhenever weâre away from home, we canât do that. We can be away for weeks at a time. They know at 5.30 theyâll see their family. We could be away for a month.â
Â
Overall promoting new events around the world must be a good thing, helping to grow the game?
âYes it is. I can understand why theyâre doing it. Itâs not just about the UK. It would be nice to have more tournaments in the UK.
âBut beggars canât be choosers. Iâd love to see an event back in Belfast. The Northern Ireland Trophy ran for a few years but the recession has hit everyone and the money isnât there any more.
âAt the moment the only people putting money in seem to be China and Europe.
âAs much as I donât like China, obviously if the money is there, then Iâll go there.â
Â
What donât you like about China?
"Itâs the travel and itâs a different culture. You have to appreciate youâre in someone elseâs country and Chinese food at home is completely different to Chinese food in China!! Itâs just called food over there and itâs different!
âI donât really like it. I end up spending a lot of time in the hotel room and itâs too expensive to take people over with me and it gets a bit lonely to be honest with you.â
Â
Courtesy - Monique Limbos
Â
Is there a lot fan support in China for the players?
âPeople talk about how big it is over there but whenever we go to Shanghai Masters or China Open the crowds arenât THAT good.
âUnless Dingâs playing or Ronnieâs. Even Judd, whoâs got so much publicity lately, and rightly so, even if he plays out in China at the moment, he doesnât get that much coverage.
âMaybe the players arenât seeing how big it is out there. Maybe itâs growing at the grass roots with more people watching and playing. With Chinese government getting involved and so on. But the players arenât really seeing any benefits from it at the moment.â
Â
Having criticised Barry Hearn yesterday? âDid I!!!â Would you have any ideas on how to build up or promote the game?
âNo! Thatâs Barryâs job! Iâm not voicing my opinion any more!!
âI did criticise Barry, but really itâs hard, wrong maybe, to criticise someone when you donât have any ideas yourself.
âBut when you can see somethingâs not working then itâs only right you should be able to speak out.
âMaybe constructive criticism if it helps to change things. Iâll probably get into trouble for having spoken out but I donât mind if it benefits the sport in the near, and more distant future.â
Â
Find out more about Mark Allen and the other On Q Promotions players including Jimmy White, Tony Drago and Mark Davis on the On Q Website.
|